Chairman of ECOCARE Maldives Mr. Mohamed Zahir has met with Mr. Amir Mansoor, an individual who’s been on the endeavor of introducing a dolphin park at a lagoon in the Maldives. This is their conversation.

• The meeting was held at an office located at Lily Company’s owner Malla Nasir’s building on January 1, 2012 from 22:30 to 23:54.

• The persons who took part in the meeting are Mohamed Zahir and Amir Mansoor.

• This meeting was arranged when Amir Mansoor contacted Mohamed Zahir over the phone in the afternoon of January 1, 2012 and requested for such a meeting.

Important discussions of the meeting!

• Amir Mansoor presented drawings of the lagoon at which he is planning to open the dolphin park and provided information of the activities planned to be hosted there. Mansoor said apart from exhibiting dolphins, some parts of the lagoon are designed to host water sports and other sports such as dart and table tennis. According to Mansoor, making arrangements for such activities is a huge investment and would be impossible to sustain without financial returns. Therefore he plans especially to target on the tourists visiting the Maldives.

• Mansoor said the dolphins to be exhibited at the lagoon are from a dolphinarium located in the Caribbean. They are second generation breed dolphins being cared for and trained there. Once the dolphins are brought to the lagoon being developed near Male’, arrangements will be made for both locals and tourists to visit them for a fee. Apart from dolphin shows, there will be programs that would allow the guests to swim and dive with the dolphins.

• According to Mansoor the dolphins are to be brought into the Maldives in accordance with the regulations of CITIES. And Mansoor also noted that the Maldives is not a member of CITIES.

• Mansoor said he has had discussions with the President of the Maldives Mr. Mohamed Nasheed sometime back regarding this venture; he is planning to introduce to the Maldives and said that this venture has the support from the Maldivian government.

• After the work had begun and commenced to this level, even after we had attained the go ahead from the cabinet, the people who are standing against this venture are trying to stop this from happening in the Maldives, said Mansoor. According to Mansoor, while people are speaking against the venture, among them are persons such as Koli Mohamed Manik.  Mansoor raised the questions “how many resorts from the company Universal has had land reclaimed, lagoons dug up and sea walls built?” among other such questions. He questioned who among the people speaking against this venture were concerned about the environment and claimed that none of them were.

• Even when such activities are negatively impacting the Maldivian environment, nothing is done to stop such activities and noted that what these people say regarding his venture are totally untrue and motivated by financial benefits. In addition, Mansoor pointed out that even if we take a look at Zahir, he too has cats living at his place!

• Furthermore, Mansoor said that he had met and discussed this issue with Ibrahim Naeem from the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA and noted that he too could not give an answer to Mansoors’s questions. The answers received were all about laws, regulations and the need to clarify legal issues and were unsubstantial to his endeavor.

• During the past Mansoor had installed numerous mooring buoys at various dive spots in the Maldives with the purpose of reducing the damage caused onto the reefs by anchors. He noted that he does not know what has happened to these buoys now and stated that this has lead him to once again question who cares about the environment.  He raised the question “what happened to the whale sharks that were previously found near Maamigili after the land reclamation?” According to Mansoor, as a person who regularly dives and observes at this location, he questioned who spoke against this land reclamation. He also stated that at present whale sharks are no longer found around this area.

• Mansoor raised the question as to whether there was a resort in the Maldives nowadays who has not got rooms built in the ocean with it’s pillars being rooted into the reef. He also said that if to develop a high-end, high-quality resort, these ocean rooms have to be built and asked if so what are they saying about the environment.

• While the situation is like this, so many people are standing up with untrue statements against Amir Mansoor building a dolphin park because these people are led by a white foreigner and he is arranging his “bread and butter” by paying people said Mansoor. He also accused Ecocare saying that they too were standing up against his venture because they too received funds and payments.

• Mansoor said it was Mark Berman who aided Ecocare to work against his venture and also said that Mark Berman has a notion that since Earth Island Institute gives out Dolphin Free labels to Maldivian fish exporters, he can stop this dolphin venture too.  If he manages to get many people on his side and stop this, he would be able to tell his tale of stopping it in the Maldives too while he is at various other countries of the world said Mansoor. With disheartenment Mansoor stated that this is how he manages to save his “bread and butter”.

• Mansoor raised the question as to how many countries in the world has such dolphin parks and how many of them were Berman actually able to halt?

• Mansoor said that he had previously on numerous occasions communicated with Berman via email under the pretense of an American identity and the resulting communications ended with Berman not being able to say anything solid. Mansoor said that Berman could not answer a single one of his questions and later Berman halted the communications suspecting that Mansoor was a person from the Maldivian Fisheries.

• After Mansoor expressed his concerns this is what I (Mohamed Zahir) told him. Ecocare has not received any huge funds from an individual or party for this campaign and assured Mansoor that such a financial promise was never made.

• I told him that when land was reclaimed, resorts were expanded, etc. in the Maldives, at every major such event; we had stood up to it at governmental, organizational and individual level. And also told him that I had spoken against the Reethi Rah issue, land reclamation at Hulhumale’, and importing impure oil to run engines in the Maldives. But they did it without listening to us didn’t they? I asked Mansoor. However, our efforts will be proven to tomorrow’s generations by historical records and they would not have the opportunity to blame us.

• I said that even though we are speaking against this venture, I believe it would eventually happen if it’s got the backing of the government. And I also told him that we do not doubt that his venture would be achievable if Mansoor continues saying that he would do it no matter what and that he’s got the funds to do it and persists with the venture without giving up. Money and influence can make anything possible I told him.

• However if the present day environmentalists and our selves believe something as not appropriate to be carried out in the Maldives, we will publicly stand up against it, exposing all the reasons as to why we believe so. We do this because we do not want the younger generations of our country to accuse and place the blame on us for negligence.

• We are standing up against the dolphin park focusing mostly not on the scientific disadvantages but rather, disadvantages that are perceived by the human mind. If we include the scientific findings, the points on our list would be far numerous.

1. When we take a look at the history and culture of the Maldives, such a venture has never been carried out in the Maldives. And also it does not suit the Maldivian culture.
2. The Maldivian Tourism industry is functioning without such dolphin parks. Rather the Maldives has been marketed as a destination where tourists can enjoy numerous types of free-living whales, sharks, turtles and dolphins at the pristine beaches, beautiful coral gardens and vast open seas. And since the name “Maldives” has attained a high status among tourist destinations world wide as a destination that has been established without such dolphin parks, we see it as unnecessary.
3. As the Maldives is being advertised as “always natural” to the world market, having such parks with captivated animals where people can take rides on the backs of dolphins would be seen as inconsistent with how the Maldives is marketed to the tourists arriving in the country.
4. The dolphins that are to be brought into the Maldives (from the Caribbean) are marine life from a foreign environment. While both the locals and the tourists take interest in seeing the dolphins that dance freely in the Maldivian seas, bringing in alien species such as Atlantic Bottle Nose dolphins and keeping them captivated in a lagoon might lead to diseases and might raise concern over other marine creatures and dolphins that naturally inhabit the nearby areas being contaminated by it.
5. It is known for a fact that these dolphins being brought to the Maldives come from elder generations of dolphins captured by pirates from various seas of the world. Buying them at expensive prices definitively lead us to believe that Maldivians are motivating the pirates to expand their market into the country and funding for their robberies.
6. The poachers that steal dolphins, whales and other marine life from the oceans gain assurance that their actions have the support of some Maldivian entrepreneurs and may attempt to expand the market in the Maldives. This raises the dangerous possibility for the dolphins naturally living in the Maldives being captured and transported somewhere else.
7. Maldives is known to be a nation that puts in an immense effort to protect the environment, the Maldivian government has been voicing out environmental issues at various corners of the earth and the nation has already signed important conventions such as the Convention on Biological Diversity. Therefore if the actions and words of some individuals of the nation don’t match up, the loss and disadvantages the nation would face in this arena.
8. If permission is granted for one party to open a dolphin lagoon in the Maldives, or if a party opens such a lagoon in the Maldives, permits have to be given out to various other parties wanting to conduct the same business resulting in more parties being interested in such ventures.
9. As the Maldivians have long been creative people, having such a lagoon set up might result in dolphins being captured and being kept at lagoons at various other parts of the country.
10. If a dolphin lagoon is set up by some people today, another group of people might try to set up circuses where they bring elephants tomorrow and this would lead to difficulties when trying to stop such activities.
11. Some people may get interested in building a zoo on a Maldivian island tomorrow.
12. While they say that this would benefit the Maldivian tourism industry, it is known for a fact that this would only cause losses for the resorts in this country. (Even if the tourists who arrive with the smallest of budgets visits this dolphin lagoon for a day, this would mean that that tourist would not spend any money on the resort’s bar, shop, snorkeling, diving, for food or any other things.)
13. While it is being said that at the dolphin lagoon, school children will be given the opportunity to conduct various research on dolphins, it is known that for research it is the wild living dolphins that are needed and such an opportunity would not be available at the lagoon.
14. Breeding dolphins and trafficking dolphins from country to country might negatively impact the Maldivian fishing industry.
15. The laws being implemented by the Maldivian Fisheries ministry and the Maldivian Environment ministry clearly state that dolphins are protected in this country by law.

At the meeting between Mansoor, and myself one of the topics of conversation was a letter from the Department of National Planning sent to Mansoor on 27 November 2011 containing a set of conditions for releasing the lagoon to him.  Mansoor shared the letter with me. Below is the letter (translated) without omission or alteration.  The letter consists of two points.

“1. Under the guideline published on the Maldivian gazette on 22 September 2011 “Procedure for tourism related proposals”, the Maldivian government has decided that the lagoon may be leased to you for 12 years. Under this guideline, having the sizes of the locations proposed for such tourism related ventures considered, development projects are required to be implemented and completed. According to the size of the lagoon proposed by you, under the guideline you are required to implement a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) worth 7,000,000 USD within the project.  Therefore a development project must be carried out that would meet the amount stated by the Maldivian government.

2. The CSR component of this project has been decided to be the development of roads on an island or islands decided by the Maldivian government.

Therefore, if you agree to go forward with the project in accordance with the requirements stated, please inform this department by 16:00 on 20 December 2011.”

Mansoor said that the guideline referred to in the letter applies to tourist resorts, yacht marinas and other such ventures and claims that funds do not need to be spent according to it. He said that he is conducting discussions with the government on this issue and stated that this project can be carried out without making those payments.

• Even now, when the dolphins are kept at a foreign location, their food and other expenses are being paid by him, said Mansoor and stated that this project will be implemented in the Maldives by all means. He furthermore stated that not a single party has presented him with a solid reason for not going through with his plan or the dangers it might cause people. He added that if such a reason were presented with solidity, he would halt his project.

http://erin-journey2taiji.blogspot.in/

The dolphin lagoon proposed by tennis player and businessman Amir Mansoor is marketed as a conservation project and education program based in a natural lagoon. His charm and honeyed words accompanied with deep pockets have helped him on his way to achieving this goal by catering to the greed of government officials and private parties.

On October4th, 2011 the cabinet approved a proposal to lease out the lagoon located between Thilafushi and Baros, diameter of some 2 kms, to Mansoor for 21 years. This decision brought about a backlash from environmental activist both local and international attracting the attention of various organisations and people including Richard O’Barry, Director of Earth Island Institute’s Dolphin Project, who was also featured in the award winning documentary, The Cove, and Mark Berman, Associate Director of the Dolphin Safe program.

To handle the bad press promoted by various environmental organisations and dive associations Mansoor and his lackeys have brought forth many arguments justifying the dolphin lagoon and how it will be beneficial to both the Maldives and to the dolphins. But I, myself don’t see how importing 6-8 bottlenose dolphins n keeping them captive for human entertainment would benefit either.

First of all as these bottlenose dolphins are from the Atlantic and thus not from Maldivian waters, importing them unbalances the delicate ecosystem of our waters and increases the chance of diseases for the wild dolphin community. Also as the website for the lagoon says, essentially these dolphins are free and able to leave whenever they wish as they are permitted on “daily unstructured excursions”, then there is a chance of these dolphins to interact with the native creatures possibly causing spread of diseases in the wild population.

It is very hard to believe that these dolphins which have been born and bred in captivity and transported into Maldives will be free to leave if they aren’t happy, however much Amir Mansoor would like us to think so. Can anybody believe that a business man would spend money and resources to lease a lagoon, do the necessary preparations and bring in trained dolphins to let even one escape from their confinement? I find myself wondering what sort of measures Amir Mansoor will take to protect his investment.

And for this investment to bring in the necessary profits, they would need to provide the entertainment. The entertainment being the dolphins shows. Dolphins forced to captivity and made to perform die within 2-5 years, whereas in the wild these creatures can live up to 40 years of age. There have even been cases of dolphins committing suicide rather than living in captivity. Are we willing to subject dolphins to this cruelty just for our own entertainment?

The dolphinarium is considered to be one of the largest of its kind for so few a number of dolphins. Just because a cage is a bit larger than the other cages, does not make it anything other than a cage. Dolphins on average travel up to distances of 50 km per day, while the lagoon has a diameter of some 2 kms. A 2 km lagoon does not even compare to the open ocean.

It is not just the dolphins, the environment, and countless small businesses that will suffer, but Maldives as a whole will also be subjected to great losses. Our reputation as an “always natural” country will be tarnished, degrading our standing as a pro-environment tourism country. Maldives has a unique natural beauty and this is what the people want to see and experience when they visit Maldives.

The fisheries industry will also suffer as Earth Island Institute (EII) has said they will withdraw the dolphin safe label from government owned tuna companies – Felivaru, Koodoo and MIFCO, discrediting them in the international market if the dolphin lagoon is approved. This will vastly decrease the country’s revenue and bring about huge losses to the country’s economy.

Fortunately thanks to all of the people who have stood up for the plight of the dolphins, the cabinet is reconsidering their decision to permit this project. Insha Allah, they will make the right decision this time around.

Photo : http://maldivestourismonline.com

I am a 15 year old student. I have been fascinated by dolphins and whales as long as I can remember. Since I opened my eyes into a blessed island surrounded by the ocean, I have seen dolphins more than a few times in the wild. In my eyes, I saw breathtaking creatures that teased and leaped in the endless ocean. They are definitely interested and curious about human beings, and it was impossible not to feel their joy and freedom just watching them. To me, dolphins resembled freedom, and I’m sure that any Maldivian who had encountered the amazing cetaceans in the wild will feel it to some extent too!

About three years ago, my interest in animals made me persuade my parents to take me to the Safari World during a trip to Bangkok, Thailand. We visited the Dolphin and Beluga Whale show, which I profoundly regretted later. I could see the difference between the wild dolphins in Maldives and the dolphins in the show. They were miserable! Sure, the tank in which they were kept was gigantic, but I questioned myself. Is the tank big enough for these mammals that were once swimming in an endless ocean which by no means can be compared to this cage? Dolphins are mammals, not fish. They are huge, meaningful creatures with big hearts confined in a small body. Thus, that visit to the Safari World turned out to be my last trip to a place where dolphins and whales were cruelly kept in captivity. It was merely a feeling that these animals did not belong there.

Later, I saw the movie “The Cove” which confirmed that it was not only a feeling! Dolphins and whales do not belong in captivity. “In the wild, they’re travelling 40 miles a day. They could be surfing at one area in the morning, and the next hour they could be 25 miles away teasing or socializing. Dolphins are acoustic creatures. These dolphins are captured and put in a concrete tank surrounded by a stadium full of screaming people.” Imagine how they would feel!

When I heard the news about the opening of a dolphinarium in Maldives, it was like a nightmare come true! Since the government ministers have given Mr. Amir Mansoor the right to open a dolphinarium, I did a research on the Internet, trying to understand why the government would promote this absurd proposal to open a dolphinarium in an eco friendly country like Maldives. Here are a few facts that I believe the public, and the Maldivian government should be aware of:

• The average life span of a dolphin in the wild is 45 years; yet half of all captured dolphins die within their first two years of captivity. The survivors last an average of only 5 years in captivity.
• When a baby dolphin is born in captivity, the news is usually kept secret until the calf shows signs of survival. Although marine mammals do breed in captivity, the birth rate is not nearly as successful as the one in the wild, with high infant mortality rates.
• Wild dolphins can swim 40 to 100 miles per day – in pools they go around in circles.
• Many marine parks subject their mammals to hunger so they will perform for their food. Jumping through hoops, tail walking and playing ball are trained behaviors that do not occur in the wild.
• When trapped together, males often become agitated and domineering. This creates pecking orders (unknown in the wild) and unprovoked attacks on each other and the trainers. In the ocean, although fights are not unknown, the wild dolphins have a chance to escape.

As dolphins and whales are large wild animals, the stress and trauma caused by captivity makes them dangerous, which proposes a threat to their trainers. The following is evidence.

In the year 2000, a dolphin entangled a trainer in a net, spun her around and held her underwater during a dolphin capture exercise at Sea World, San Diego. The trainer suffered three fractures and torn ligaments in her right arm.

In the year 2002, a Killer whale Orkid pulled a trainer into the pool by her foot at Sea World, San Diego. The trainer broke her arm before being rescued.

In the year 2006 a dolphin bit a boy celebrating his 7th birthday with a sleepover at SeaWorld Orlando. The boy, under the supervision of a SeaWorld employee, was petting the dolphin at the Dolphin Cove, a petting attraction. The boy’s mother, Hollie Bethany, told the Orlando Sentinel two adults had to pry the dolphin’s mouth open to free the boy’s hand. The bite bruised the boy’s thumb but did not break the skin. SeaWorld spokeswoman Becca Bides told the paper no changes are being planned for the attraction. A dolphin at the same attraction had bitten a 6-year-old Georgia boy on the arm three weeks earlier, the Sentinel reported. Bides said the dolphin in that incident might be sent to a “behavior modification” program.

In 2010, Trainer Dawn Brancheau, 40, was grabbed by a killer whale, pulled into the water and held there at Sea World, Orlando. She was killed brutally by this stressed out whale in front of thousands of spectators.

Like Richard O’Berry once said, dolphins are whales. Size does not matter!

I would like to state that no matter how much we try to replicate the features of the sea in a dolphin cage; there is no possibility that a dolphin held captive will be happy and healthy. This is not a matter of keeping the dolphins in Maldives safe. The dolphins that are bred in captivity and transported to Maldives are also dolphins. This is a matter of saving and protecting these wild animals and discouraging the brutal hunting and slaughtering of dolphins worldwide. I wish that this could not only be about the huge amounts of profit that could be made from this industry, but also about what a good deed we are doing for the environment and ways of life and nature by refraining from such activities which can only be stated as inhumane animal abuse. I sincerely hope that the government ministers and Mr. Amir Mansoor will consider this, and find sympathy and love in their hearts to prevent this nightmare from happening by abstaining from holding dolphins, which can help diminish the number of dolphins that are captured every year in order to be sold to dolphinariums all over the world.

This article was sent to ECOCARE Maldives by Karam Ibrahim, Ma. Kashmeeru Vaadhee. She is a 15 year old student who stands against the idea of a dolphinarium in Maldives.